Daily Archives: 3 April 2024

Young adults who experience migraines, along with other unconventional risk factors, may face an increased risk of stroke

Adults under the age of 35 to 45 may face a higher risk of stroke from less conventional risk factors like migraines than from traditional ones such as hypertension. This insight comes from recent research in the journal Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, endorsed by the American Heart Association. Typically, strokes are attributed to well-known risk factors, including high blood pressure, elevated cholesterol levels, Type 2 diabetes, smoking habits, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, alcohol misuse, or coronary artery disease. However, current studies have indicated a rising occurrence of strokes in younger adults who do not have these risk factors.

Michelle Leppert, M.D., M.S., M.B.A., FAHA, an assistant professor of neurology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine in Aurora, Colorado, and the lead author of the study, expressed a desire to pinpoint the primary risk factors contributing to stroke risk among younger adults. Through the analysis of health insurance claim data from Colorado, the research team compared over 2,600 individuals who had experienced strokes with more than 7,800 who had not, aiming to identify the risk factors most commonly leading to strokes.

The findings revealed a significant association between unconventional stroke risk factors — such as migraines, blood clotting disorders, kidney failure, autoimmune diseases, or cancer — and stroke occurrence in individuals aged 18 to 44. This association was even more pronounced in those younger than 35. The study highlighted that:

– In the 18 to 34 age group, strokes linked to nontraditional risk factors were more prevalent (31% in men and about 43% in women) than those related to traditional risk factors (about 25% in men and more than 33% in women).
– Migraines emerged as the most significant nontraditional stroke risk factor in the 18 to 34 age bracket, contributing to 20% of strokes in men and nearly 35% in women.
– The influence of traditional stroke risk factors was most notable among adults aged 35 to 44, being associated with nearly 33% of strokes in men and about 40% in women.
– For individuals aged 45 to 55, nontraditional risk factors were responsible for over 19% of strokes in men and nearly 28% in women, with high blood pressure being the primary traditional risk factor in this age group, accounting for 28% of strokes in men and about 27% in women.
– The presence of each additional traditional or nontraditional risk factor was linked to an increased stroke risk across all sex and age categories.

Leppert emphasized the importance of not overlooking nontraditional stroke risk factors in favour of focusing solely on traditional ones, as both types are crucial in young people’s stroke development. The younger an individual at the time of their stroke, the more likely it is to be attributed to a nontraditional risk factor, necessitating a deeper understanding of these factors to devise targeted prevention strategies.

The study’s findings were unexpected, revealing that nontraditional risk factors hold equal importance to traditional ones in young adults’ stroke development. Astonishing was the significant role of migraines in stroke occurrence. This study, pioneering in highlighting the extent of stroke risk associated with migraines, utilized data from the Colorado All Payer Claims Database, covering 2012-2019, focusing on ischemic strokes caused by blood flow obstruction to the brain.

Despite its comprehensive data, the study faced limitations, such as potential inaccuracies in risk factor documentation and the absence of race and ethnicity information for many participants. Additionally, because the research was conducted in areas over a mile above sea level, its findings might only apply sometimes. This study underscores the need for heightened awareness and research into both traditional and nontraditional stroke risk factors among younger populations to understand better and mitigate the risk of stroke across all demographics.

More information: Michelle H. Leppert et al, Association of Traditional and Nontraditional Risk Factors in the Development of Strokes Among Young Adults by Sex and Age Group: A Retrospective Case-Control Study, Circulation. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-023-03123-x

Journal information: Circulation Provided by American Heart Association

Factors contributing to the increased risk of frailty in old age vary between men and women

Elderly individuals diagnosed with frailty syndrome require prioritization in primary healthcare settings due to their heightened susceptibility to falls, hospitalizations, disability, and premature mortality. This syndrome is identified by three or more of the following indicators: unintended weight loss, exhaustion, muscle weakness, slow walking speed, and a reduced level of physical activity.

Research conducted by the Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar) in Brazil and University College London (UCL) in the UK has unveiled that the precursors to frailty in old age are distinct for men and women.

Funded by FAPESP, this investigation’s findings have been documented in an article in the Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics journal.

The study highlights that in men, the risk of developing frailty is escalated by osteoporosis, underweight, cardiac ailments, and impaired hearing. Conversely, in women, elevated fibrinogen levels (an indicator of cardiovascular disease), diabetes, and stroke significantly increase the risk of frailty.

These conclusions stem from an analysis of data involving 1,747 participants from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), a continuous survey initiated in 2002 that examines the interplay between health, functionality, social connections, and economic status among individuals aged 50 and above residing in England. The selected participants, aged 60 or older, were devoid of frailty syndrome at the outset and were not considered pre-frail. Their interviews and evaluations were conducted quadrennially from 2004 to 2016.

Tiago da Silva Alexandre, a professor in the Department of Gerontology at UFSCar and the study’s senior author, posited that frailty syndrome signals the potential for adverse outcomes in the elderly. The study revealed multiple pathways to frailty and highlighted significant gender disparities that policymakers must consider. These insights could inform gender-specific strategies and interventions in primary healthcare for older adults.

Alexandre further explained that frailty syndrome possesses a phenotype, meaning a collection of easily recognizable signs and symptoms aimed at identifying older adults at a greater risk of adverse health outcomes. The research seeks to identify the attributes that may predispose individuals to frailty, thereby aiding in anticipating potential issues and formulating public policies tailored to both men and women.

Originating from Dayane Capra de Oliveira’s doctoral research under Alexandre’s supervision, the study underscores the role of sex-specific differences in risk factors for frailty, largely attributed to differing social roles and resource access throughout life between men and women.

Oliveira noted that frailty is a multifactorial condition. For men, socioeconomic factors, skeletal muscle disorders, heart disease, and low weight are fundamental to the onset of frailty. In contrast, for women, cardiovascular and neuroendocrine disturbances primarily drive the condition.

The research also points out the higher prevalence of frailty syndrome in women, partly due to their longer life expectancy. According to Alexandre, this complexity arises from varying life spans and disease prevalence between genders, with women more frequently affected by chronic, disabling conditions, leading to a higher incidence of frailty syndrome.

While certain frailty risk factors are common to both genders, such as age, low educational levels, sedentary lifestyles, and depression, differences in body composition and fat distribution, particularly in old age, may lead to metabolic changes and disease development, increasing frailty risk.

The study’s focus on individuals aged 60 or older residing in England does not necessarily predict how these gender-specific differences will manifest in future generations. However, it was observed that men in the cohort were more exposed to various risk factors, including working conditions, unhealthy diets, less frequent medical consultations, and higher consumption of alcohol and other substances, elevating their risk of cardiovascular diseases and heart attacks.

In summary, the gender-specific differences highlighted by the study serve as a backdrop to different ageing processes, causes of death or disability, and types of frailty experienced by men and women, underscoring the need for tailored approaches in managing frailty syndrome among the elderly.

More information: Dayane Capra de Oliveira et al, Does the incidence of frailty differ between men and women over time?, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics. DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104880

Journal information: Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Provided by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo