Daily Archives: 11 June 2024

A wild bird gestures “after you”

A small bird species, the Japanese tit (Parus minor), uses wing movements as a gesture to convey the message “after you,” according to new research at the University of Tokyo. When a mating pair arrives at their nest box with food, they wait outside on perches. One will often flutter its wings toward the other, seemingly indicating the latter to enter first. This discovery challenges the belief that gestural communication is mainly observed in humans and great apes, significantly enhancing our understanding of visual communication in birds.

Gestures such as a thumbs up, waving goodbye, or pointing to a book on a shelf are fundamental aspects of human communication. Previously, these gestures were considered exclusive to humans until studies on great apes like chimpanzees and bonobos showed they also use body movements to communicate non-verbally. Recent studies on other species, including ravens and fish, have demonstrated that they employ simple gestures to indicate objects or express interest, known as deictic gesturing. However, symbolic gestures that involve more complex cognitive skills, like extending an open hand to signal “after you,” were believed to be absent in animals other than humans.

Researchers at the University of Tokyo were thus astonished to find concrete evidence of symbolic gesture usage by the Japanese tit. Associate Professor Toshitaka Suzuki from the University of Tokyo shared that after studying these birds for over 17 years, focusing on their diverse vocalizations and use of syntactic rules to combine different calls, the team initiated research into their use of physical gestures. During the spring, Japanese tits pair up and build their nests inside tree cavities. Suzuki and his colleague, Norimasa Sugita, observed 16 parent birds (eight pairs) in nest boxes. They noticed that while delivering food to their nestlings, the birds would perch nearby, and one would flutter their wings at the other. Detailed analysis of over 320 nest visits revealed that this wing-fluttering gesture encouraged the recipient to enter the nest box first, establishing a sequential order similar to the polite human gesture of “after you.”

Suzuki explained that the gesture’s significance was more apparent than anticipated. It occurred exclusively when a mate was present, and almost invariably, the mate entered the nest box first after seeing the gesture. The gesture was more frequently performed by female birds, leading to the male entering the nest box subsequently, regardless of who arrived first. If the female did not flutter her wings, she generally entered before the male.

The researchers assert that this behaviour meets the criteria for being considered a symbolic gesture as it only occurs in the presence of a mate, ceases once the mate has entered the nest box, and prompts entry without physical contact. Moreover, the wing-fluttering “after you” gesture targets the mate rather than the nest box, distinguishing it from a deictic gesture that indicates the position of an object.

Suzuki further hypothesized that just as bipedalism in humans might have facilitated gestural communication by freeing the hands, perching frees birds’ wings, potentially enabling gestural communication. The team aims to continue exploring how birds communicate through gestures and vocalizations. This research not only helps decode the complex world of animal communication but also provides insights into the origins and evolution of human language.

More information: Toshitaka N. Suzuki et al, The ‘after you’ gesture in a bird, Current Biology. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.01.030

Journal information: Current Biology Provided by The University of Tokyo

New research emphasises the advantages of touch on mental and physical well-being

The soothing sensation of a hug or a gentle touch is a familiar experience. But can touch truly improve our well-being, and does the source and manner of touch matter? To address these questions, a team of seasoned researchers from the Social Brain Lab at the Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience and the University Hospital Essen conducted a meticulous analysis of touch intervention studies, bringing their unique expertise to the field.

The impact of touch on mental and physical health is significant. It’s a straightforward question to pose but more complex to answer. Individual studies concentrate on specific scenarios and sometimes present conflicting conclusions. A more precise answer emerges by amalgamating all these studies in a large-scale analysis: touch markedly enhances physical and mental well-being. This includes reductions in pain, anxiety, depression, and stress in adults. Interestingly, those with physical or mental health issues—who are most in need of support—derive even more significant benefits from touch than healthy adults. “This is particularly pertinent considering how often touch interventions are disregarded,” notes Packheiser, the lead author.

Professor Keysers, director of the Social Brain Lab, highlights a crucial aspect of their study: “We aimed to leverage the hundreds of individual studies to determine which type of touch is most effective. What if you don’t have a friend or partner nearby to hug you? Would touch from a stranger or even a machine also be beneficial? And how often?” The study conclusively shows that while touch can be optimized, the most significant factors are only sometimes those we might anticipate.

Interestingly, the individual delivering the touch, the manner of touch, and the duration do not significantly impact its effectiveness. A prolonged massage by a therapist could be as beneficial as a brief hug from a friend. However, the frequency of the intervention plays a critical role. A frequently offered quick hug could be more impactful than a massage if administered more often.

The subsequent inquiry focused on whether the touch intervention needs to be human. The findings reveal that interventions using objects or robots can be just as effective in enhancing physical well-being. “There are many individuals in need of wellbeing improvements, possibly due to loneliness or clinical conditions. These results suggest that a touch-robot, or even a simple weighted blanket, has the potential to assist these individuals,” explains Michon, the last author. However, the effectiveness of robot and object interventions is lesser for mental wellbeing. Disorders like anxiety and depression might require a human touch, possibly indicating the importance of an emotional component associated with touch, Michon suggests.

The researchers also expressed curiosity about human-to-animal contact, although studies in this area still need to be completed. “It would be beneficial to explore whether an animal’s or pet’s touch could enhance wellbeing and if they benefit from it too. Unfortunately, there are not enough studies, or adequately controlled ones, to draw any broad conclusions on these topics,” Michon adds.

When examining the effects of touch on newborns, the team discovered that newborns benefit significantly from touch. However, the identity of the person administering the touch matters more: the benefits are more significant when provided by a parent rather than a healthcare worker. “This finding could be impactful,” says Packheiser. “In some countries, death rates from premature births are high, and knowing that a baby benefits more from the touch of their own parent provides another readily implementable form of support for the baby’s health.”

The need for more studies made it challenging to conclude children and teenagers. “Large-scale studies like this not only help us draw more general conclusions but also pinpoint where research is lacking,” Michon points out. “We hope our findings will guide future research to explore lesser-known areas, including animal touch, touch across different ages, and specific clinical settings, like in patients with autism, another group that has not been extensively studied.”

More information: Julian Packheiser et al, A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions, Nature Human Behaviour. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01841-8

Journal information: Nature Human Behaviour Provided by Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience